There is No God?

There Is No God?

Between 75 and 90 percent of those that have known me, up to a good extent, know that I am that man that can be termed "nonreligious". This does not translate that I do not believe in the existence of God (am not an Atheist) and neither does this mean that I am a pagan (Sun worship per) or an Idolater. It logically and reasonably transpires to the fact that I believe in logical reasoning. Matter of fact, logic is what I feel best enable my sense of understanding to the best within my reach.

Of late, I have been observant of what transpires in the world today via the internet (both on social networks and news media) most especially the recent disturbance of "Gay-ism" that some affluent personalities and entities have been propagating, the world over, and the reactions of some certain people in some certain quarters of the societies of this planet.

Some have gone as far as using this, gay-ism, as an excuse (rather, as a medium) to preach of the non-existence of a creator (God). And most of them have gone as far as trying to convert people into accepting their ideologies and school of thoughts.

Why I chose to put this pen on paper is what stemmed from my way of reasoning many, many years ago and my unanswered questions and theorems on Wiki Ask™ nine years ago (precisely in April, 2006).

During our primary and post tertiary levels of acquiring formal education, we were taught how man came into existence with two theorems (even when they both actually translate to one theorem) of science, logic and reason. And these are the "theory of evolution" (originally the Charles Darwin Theory of Evolution) and "the black hole" (Big Bang Theorem).

The "Theory of Evolution" was practicalized as proof to us through the use of one of the smallest unit of life (a tissue of cell) by asking us to take a small crumb of bread, put it in a glass jar, seal the glass jar from air (and other contaminant), dropping it (the glass jar) in a dark cupboard (ensuring no light can penetrate the jar and the cupboard) and allowing it to stand for at least seven days. We were then asked to observe the bread crumb on the seventh day, or after. We actually observed that mucus and, likely, grey matters of amoeba, had grown on it.

Now, basic science taught us that amoeba is a cell (which actually is the smallest unit of life) and thus a living thing.

In this basic science, and in both biology and integrated science in post-primary school, we were taught how the first smallest unit of life (a cell) evolved into a tissue and tissues, and subsequently a whole living system. The first ape was then classified to us, from moving from Homo-Erectus, Neanderthals to Homo-Sapiens and to the present day man and it still ensured to prove to us that man would evolve from this stage to growing wings and becoming Aves, that can fly. Thus, a time will come when men would be flying around with naturally grown wings (Bull Crap!).

The Big Bang theory was explained to us in this manner;

"Two heavenly bodies traveling on the same path, in opposite direction, with very high velocity, collided and exploded and their debris is what brought about the planets found in our universe today"

Another Bull Crap!

I wonder if the pioneers of academic learning actually thought that the whole of human race was never going to develop intelligently to ever dispute their personal opinions (Yes! Their personal opinions) or they just wanted to make a fool of man for the whole of eternity. I wonder this because, I most time think of how foolish they were to have cooked up such "scandalous bull-crap" and expected that it would be accepted that way, without questioning, for eternity.

On this fateful day of April, 2006, I logged on to the Wiki Ask™ forum only to meet the topic "Is there really a God?" and the discussion was booming with comments of opinions from different atheists, idolaters, pagans, philosophers, scholars, scientists, and other religious bigots about God and no God so, I decided to give them (mostly the atheists, philosophers and scientists) a ride on their own treat by asking for answers to my simple yet logical question of God or no God from the two theorems that philosophers and scientists usually put forward to buttress their reasoning on the existentiality of God not existing.

My first question was asked using a premise from the Big Bang (or Black Hole) theorem and it goes thus;

"taking two glass cups of exactly same measurements, dropping them from the same distance (height) with the same force to break on the floor into shads or pieces and photographing their shads or pieces, one after the other, it will be observed that they do not break or shatter into the same measurements of sizes, shapes, weights and each exact size, shape and weight will not fall on the same spot and exact distance from the others. Hence, since they wouldn't, how is it possible that the two heavenly bodies that collided formed the planets of our universe that has been rotating for billions of years about the sun, on and about their axis without skidding or sliding off from and on their axis, about their axis and have never rotated otherwise if not because they are obeying a law or command put in place by a superior and magnanimous being that is known as God?"

Secondly, using a premise from the theorem of evolution's experiment of bread crumb in a glass jar and the subsequent evolvement of a life form known as amoeba, I asked;

"Bread is majorly flour (gotten from grinding wheat into powder) and yeast, both from living things. Bread crumb is from flour, flour is from wheat, wheat is a crop (plant) thus, it is also a living thing and we all agree to that (no doubt from any school of thought at all about that), now who created that first living thing (the wheat plant) that was used to make flour which in turn make bread, that we got our crumb from, that gave rise to that first living organism that has evolved to become man in his present day that will evolve into the flying Ave man so expected to come by scientists and other believers of that school of thought, if not a superior and magnanimous being that is known as God?"

As at the moment of penning down this thoughts of mine, these two questions above are yet to be answered and, like I told them in that forum;

"until my two theorems as questions are satisfactorily answered beyond all reasonable doubt (even when I do not attach myself to a particular form of religion, for the fact  that I see religion as a brain-child of man and the main problem of man)"

I will continue to believe in God and the fact that God exists.

At this juncture, I strongly believe that after you are done reading this and you still believe God does not exist then "You are on long thing. OYO for you O...". As for me and my household, there is a God, He is God and we will continue to worship him, now and forever.

With this little logic, you still believe there is no God? "e be like say you don dey madt abi!"

Courtesy: Mallam Sambo, S.D.